Renewing my visa, or how a poor user experience cost me £500

17 December 2015 - Jessica Cameron

Passport and immigration law book

Having now been in the UK for two years and nine months, I recently found myself needing to renew my visa in order to continue living and working here.

Getting started

Armed with a nice cup of tea, I began the process in August. I knew that I wanted to make a premium service appointment, which would cost a bit more but let me avoid having to send away my passport, and that I wanted the appointment to fall just before my visa expiry date in December.

My first port of call was GOV.UK(this will open in a new window), the website for all things UK government related. The navigation of the site was beautifully straightforward; clicking the ‘visas and immigration’ link on the homepage took me into an A-Z list of relevant topics, where ‘family visas’ was clearly the one that applied to my situation as the spouse of a UK citizen.

GOV.UK home page

From there, ‘apply to remain in the UK with family’ sounded like exactly what I was looking for. While there were potentially other avenues to explore, I was pleased that this happy path was so easy to find.

GOV.UK navigation

The instructions

Once I reached the application instructions, I had to do a bit of extra research to figure out if I was a partner on 2-year or a 5-year route, but good descriptive linking made it easy to find the information I was looking for.

I also read about the immigration health surcharge(this will open in a new window)(IHS), which would add an additional £500 onto a not inconsiderable set of fees. It was unclear if I would have to pay it to book an appointment, but I figured the application would clarify that.

I clicked through to book an appointment.

Making an appointment

I ended up on the UK Visas & Immigration Page. Not as user friendly as the GOV.UK site, and a big red insecure logo in the browser bar gave me pause, but I soldiered bravely on.

A red line through https means the website is not secure

I had to create an account, and then choose the type of visa I was applying for. The menu of options contained a dizzying list of acronyms, and I had to do a bit of hunting to figure out which specific application I needed. Unfortunately, the friendly ‘apply to remain in the UK with family’ language used on GOV.UK is not repeated anywhere on the application portal, but a short set of questions provided as guidance helped me confirm that what I needed was an FLR(M) application.

I eventually reached a page directing me back to GOV.UK to pay the IHS, separately from the rest of the application fees. After I paid my £500, I was taken back to the application portal, where I saw that appointments were available… but only six weeks ahead. So I signed out, noted down my IHS reference number, and set a calendar reminder to come back and make an appointment in October.

In mid-October I went through the process again, and reached the point where I had to pay my IHS. I found that there was no way to continue my application without paying it again.

NOT twice as nice

That’s right. I had to pay a £500 surcharge TWICE, just so I could submit an application for an appointment.

Huge usability fail. I phoned up to make sure I wasn’t missing something, and learned that no, there really was no way for me to input my reference number or otherwise indicate that I had already paid this surcharge. All I could do was email my details and wait for a refund.

Applying for a visa is a stressful process. (Remember, all this was just to book an appointment – I still had a 74 page application form to fill out.) GOV.UK do a brilliant job of making sure that the right information is easy to find, but the process falls apart when users are directed to the application portal. Poor integration between the two systems makes the process even more stressful (and expensive) than it needs to be.

However, this process could be greatly improved if GOV.UK simply offered more information at the correct points in the user journey. At a minimum, the following details should be explained before users start the appointment booking process:

  1. Appointments can only be made up to six weeks in advance.
  2. After paying the IHS, applicants must book their premium service appointments in the same session.

As a bonus, GOV.UK could inform users of what terminology they will need to know (e.g., visa names) to book an appointment.

Update

Happily, I have now received both my visa and my refund. The former took four days from the date of my appointment; the latter took more than two months from the date I requested it.

Synthetic Users and Digital Clones: A UX Researcher’s Honest Take

2 April 2026

AI research tools promise speed – but at what cost to human insight? Are synthetic users and digital clones really the same, and do they truly work for UX research? We cut through the hype to share a clear, practical view: where synthetic methods add genuine value, where human insight remains essential, and how to tell the difference between synthetic users and digital clones in real‑world research. A must‑read for UX professionals, product teams, and researchers navigating AI‑driven testing.

Read the article: Synthetic Users and Digital Clones: A UX Researcher’s Honest Take

User Vision Joins the New DOS 7 Framework - Making Public Sector UX Procurement Simpler

1 April 2026

User Vision has secured a place on the Government Commercial Agency (previously CCS) new Digital Outcomes and Specialists 7 (DOS 7) framework - making it faster and simpler than ever for public sector organisations to access specialist user research, accessibility, and user-centred design services.

Read the article: User Vision Joins the New DOS 7 Framework - Making Public Sector UX Procurement Simpler

Why Your Usability Tests Are Failing: The Hidden Pitfalls That Mislead Teams

25 February 2026

Many teams run usability tests that quietly mislead them—this article exposes the hidden pitfalls in planning, moderation and analysis, and explains how to fix them.

Read the article: Why Your Usability Tests Are Failing: The Hidden Pitfalls That Mislead Teams

Explore all thoughts

Do you have a project in mind? Let’s chat about what we can do for you. Get in touch