‘Mobilegeddon’ – is your site mobile friendly?
23 April 2015 - Amy McInnes
From the 21st of April, a site’s ‘mobile friendliness’ will now play a key role in the way it is ranked on Google’s mobile search results. Key factors Google will be checking are load times, responsive design elements, and mobile best practise…basically all the elements that affect the user’s experience of a site viewed on a small screen.
Do the test
The algorithm change acknowledges the importance of having a site designed for mobile, such as through a responsive or adaptive design.
There are still sites that are not considering the mobile user experience, and as such, are failing to provide their users with the right content, in the right format, for the right journey. This in turn leads to high bounce rates, frustrated users, and low conversion rates.
Google therefore want to reward websites that do provide content that is ‘relevant and timely, but also easy to read and interact with on smaller mobile screens.(this will open in a new window)’
Do a quick check of your site with Google’s mobile-friendly test(this will open in a new window).
For example here’s the User Vision site:

Consider your mobile UX
To ensure that your website stays in the top search results, you need to make sure your site is user-friendly and relevant, across devices. Areas you should address that Google will favour:
- Reduce page load times
- Provide readable text sizes
- Remove the need to pinch and zoom
- Supply content that fits into the screen removing unnecessary scrolling
- Increase spacing around links/elements is implemented to ease tapping of required content
- Remove the requirement for Flash
What this means
No longer is it OK for the mobile experience to be as good as the desktop, it should be better. To do this, it’s key that you understand your users and offer up the right content/experience to them on their mobile.
This update will certainly hurt the rankings of those companies who have ignored mobile so far. However from a UX perspective, these users were already getting a poor experience so hopefully this will encourage businesses to change…to consider the user!
You might also be interested in...
Applying the Three Lenses Model: How to Integrate MR, CX and UX Research
21 April 2026Knowing the three lenses is one thing — here's how to actually use them together without restructuring your entire research function.
Read the article: Applying the Three Lenses Model: How to Integrate MR, CX and UX ResearchThe Three Lenses Model: How MR, CX and UX Work Better Together
16 April 2026Most organisations run market research, track CX, and test with users — but they rarely connect the dots. Here's a model that does.
Read the article: The Three Lenses Model: How MR, CX and UX Work Better TogetherSynthetic Users and Digital Clones: A UX Researcher’s Honest Take
2 April 2026AI research tools promise speed – but at what cost to human insight? Are synthetic users and digital clones really the same, and do they truly work for UX research? We cut through the hype to share a clear, practical view: where synthetic methods add genuine value, where human insight remains essential, and how to tell the difference between synthetic users and digital clones in real‑world research. A must‑read for UX professionals, product teams, and researchers navigating AI‑driven testing.
Read the article: Synthetic Users and Digital Clones: A UX Researcher’s Honest Take